💥 AI MANIA: WHEN DREAMS OUTPACE CALCULATION

🔺 The artificial intelligence boom has morphed into a construction frenzy: tech giants are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into data centers, chips, and energy infrastructure. The scale is staggering — in just three years, investments have exceeded the entire cost of building the U.S. interstate highway system. A striking example is Ellendale, North Dakota, where amid two motels and a Dollar General store, a $15B AI plant is rising — equal to a quarter of the state’s GDP.

🔺 Optimists compare this moment to the Industrial Revolution, but the core problem is obvious: AI revenue remains minuscule. OpenAI, despite contracts worth tens of billions, will generate around $13B this year. Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, and Alphabet plan to invest nearly $400B by 2025 — more than the Apollo program. Yet most AI chips last only 3–5 years, and demand is limited: corporate clients resist paying more than $30 per month per employee.

🔺 Historical parallels are unsettling. In the late 1990s, telecoms poured hundreds of billions into fiber-optic networks, betting on an internet explosion. The result — “dark fiber,” bankruptcies, and decades of underutilized capacity. Today’s data centers risk repeating that story, especially for intermediaries like CoreWeave, burdened with debt and long-term obligations against short-term contracts.

🔺 Still, the race is accelerating. Projects branded with names like “Stargate” or “Hyperion” are meant to highlight the grand ambitions. CoreWeave and its partners are erecting hangars powered by hundreds of megawatts, hoarding Nvidia chips and renting out capacity. Their soaring valuations astonish, yet much of it is fueled by high-interest debt.

🔺 Economists warn: to break even, the world would need $2T in annual AI revenues by 2030 — more than the combined earnings of all FAANG+Nvidia today. Reality is far from that mark: last year, sector revenue was just $45B. Studies from MIT and the University of Chicago show that 95% of companies see little measurable return from AI, while new models grow ever more expensive without delivering the promised breakthrough.

🔺 AI supporters counter that the differences from the dot-com era are crucial: tech giants generate immense cash flows, and AI is instantly accessible to hundreds of millions of users. ChatGPT already has more than 700M weekly users, and executives argue that AI could add 10% to global GDP.

🔺 But the risk of overheating is real. The history of the 19th-century “railway mania” and the collapse of the fiber-optic boom suggests that collective optimism often ends in painful corrections. AI will undoubtedly reshape the economy. The only question is whether the real payoff will justify today’s massive spending — or whether this boom will become yet another reminder that dreams of innovation often outpace rational calculation.

Content Hub - Articles Index - Library / Archive

#crisis

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

🗂 INDEX - REVERSALS & TRENDS

📈 EXTREMES & PIVOTS

📈 LONG-TERM CYCLES OF THE U.S. STOCK MARKET (Update)